Client Story
- lower model inference spend than an unrouted baseline, through caching and smaller models
- 35 to 60%
Cloud and AI bills you can explain, with savings that hold after the first review.
Cloud bills often grow faster than usage, as teams share accounts and tags go missing.
Nobody can say which service caused the rise. AI adds a line that is harder to see, because agent workflows can call a large model at every step.
Each line of spend has an owner and a trend against the baseline, so you can see which team or feature changed it.
Model calls and accelerators grouped by feature, with caching and smaller models lowering the bill without lowering the quality bar.
Workloads matched to real demand and commitments bought against stable use, with the risk shown before you commit.
Work sized and scheduled with its power use in view, and reports that give your sustainability team the figures it needs.
Each line of spend has an owner and a trend, so you can see which team or feature changed it.
Waste is removed, workloads fit their demand and commitments match use, with savings measured against a recorded baseline.
Teams get targets, reports and a routine review, so the saving survives after the first clean-up.
We look at what you spend and what drives it. The scope names each account and each team that owns a line.
Accounts, services and data transfer are measured by team and workload. Shared costs are split by a rule your finance team accepts.
Each workload is compared with its demand. Idle capacity, oversized machines and unused storage are listed with a fix.
Usage is grouped by feature, not only by account. Caching and smaller models are tested against a quality bar.
Reserved capacity and savings plans are matched to stable use. We show the risk before you commit.
| Priority | Response | Escalation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | under 15 minutes | immediate war-room mobilisation | under 2 to 4 hours |
| P2 | under 30 minutes | within 1 hour | under 8 hours |
| P3 | under 4 business hours | the next daily triage | 24 to 48 business hours |
| P4 | under 1 business day | the next scheduled sprint | the next scheduled release |
The work starts with the bill and ends with a change your team owns. Each stage produces evidence you can check.
We connect billing exports, tags and usage records. You give us access to each account and name the owner of each tag.
We record current spend, usage and performance for each workload. You confirm the baseline before we count any saving.
We list idle capacity, oversized machines, unused storage and model calls that add nothing. You decide which items to fix first.
We resize, remove, cache or route one item at a time. You approve each change and its route back before it is applied.
We compare the new bill with the baseline and report what worked. You agree the next round from that result.
You see the spend, the change and the evidence behind both. Reports use the same figures your finance team already keeps.
Spend by team, service and AI feature, with the change against the baseline. Every line has an owner.
Expected spend for the coming months, with the assumptions written down. You see the effect of each planned change.
Leaders see the trend, the savings and the choices ahead. Detailed tables follow in an appendix.
We work inside Amazon Web Services (AWS), where most of the spend is visible. Kubernetes shows how workloads use their capacity. OpenTelemetry, Prometheus and Grafana supply the usage and performance data behind each change.
Naming a product does not mean a partnership with its vendor.
Consumer platforms, streaming, connected devices and ad-tech that stay fast at peak audience, with AI for content and personalisation.
POS integration, stock and price sync, card payments, loyalty and e-commerce for retailers with many sites.
Software companies and technology teams: multi-tenant products, platforms and the AI features and billing that keep them growing.
What finance and technology leaders ask before they start.
It depends on the waste we find and how fast your team can change. We estimate each item first and report the result against the baseline.
The first changes show in the next billing cycle. Larger commitments take longer and need your finance team's approval.
The scope, the accounts and your tagging set the effort. You receive a proposal with the stages and the effort before work starts.
Teams get a monthly figure and a target for the lines they own. A short review keeps the saving from drifting back.
Yes. We measure model calls, tokens and accelerator use by feature. Caching and smaller models are tested before they go live.
Describe the service, the systems and the pressure you are under. The right team takes it from there.